Kubin, E., Puryear, C., Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2021). Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(6). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008389118
(APA 7: I was unable to add spaces/ the indentation.)
THESIS: The respect-inducing potential of morl opinions is more than that of facts. Respect from political opponents is most prominent for issue-related and harm-based personal experience-involving arguments.
How the article distinguishes between statements based on personal experience and based on facts?
- Personal experience is thought to be less convincing than facts by people who were initially surveyed.
- However, after doing a type of sentiment analysis of YouTube comments, videos involving personal experience got more positive comments.
- This led to the conslusion that personal experiences can be more convincing.
- More research found harm-based relevant experiences to be most effective.
The authors came up with a model that facts can appeal to rationality and when combined with personal experience, command more respect than without experience.